Meeting DORA Requirements: The Critical Technologies and Solutions to Ensure Compliance

Article
January 23, 2025
Meeting DORA Requirements: The Critical Technologies and Solutions to Ensure Compliance

Introduction

As previously explored, the Digital Operation Resilience Act (DORA) has an exhaustive set of complex requirements that cover information and communication technology (ICT) risks within the financial sector and their critical third-party technology service providers.

Failure to comply leads to significant fines that can go up to 1,000,000 Euros for financial entities and up to 5,000,000 Euros for critical third-party technology providers.

It is crucial for financial services and third-party providers to comprehensively manage their ICT risks to ensure DORA compliance. In this article, we delve deeper into the Exiger capabilities and solutions that can meet DORA requirements.

Detecting Anomalous Activities

DORA requires that financial entities develop a comprehensive ICT risk management framework that identifies, assesses, and mitigates ICT risks. Under Article 10, this includes having mechanisms to promptly detect anomalous activities, including ICT network performance issues and ICT-related incidents.

Requirement 1: Prompt Detection of Anomalies

Financial entities are required to have mechanisms to promptly detect anomalous activities in accordance with DORA Article 17 . To address this issue, it’s critical for organizations to have three capabilities:

  1. SBOM Generation and Analysis:
    • Generate and analyze SBOMs (Software Bills of Materials) to detect anomalies in software supply chains, even without source code.
    • Verify the completeness and accuracy of SBOMs and validate internal or third-party SBOMs.
    • Identify single points of failure, such as components maintained by single committers or projects at the end of life.
  2. Continuous Monitoring:
    • Monitor software components and associated risks continuously, including known vulnerabilities (CVE) and proactive identification of risks ahead of public disclosures.
    • Identify high-risk contributors, such as contributions from developers associated with adversarial organizations.
  3. Proactive Incident Detection:
    • Detect anomalies in the chain of custody of software components, identifying indicators of sabotage or hidden risks (e.g., malware, grenade-ware) before vulnerabilities become known.
    • Integrate alert thresholds to monitor and classify vulnerabilities for immediate escalation.

How to Meet Them with Exiger:

Exiger’s capabilities focus on comprehensively detecting vulnerabilities and risks within software supply chains. By leveraging tools such as SBOM generation, binary analysis, and continuous monitoring, financial entities can identify anomalous activities proactively, such as:

  • Single Points of Failure: Identifying end-of-life components, single-committer projects, or abandoned software helps entities address critical weaknesses before they lead to disruptions.
  • Proactive Risk Indicators: These tools detect leading risk indicators, such as anomalies in software lineage or contributions from high-risk sources (for example, developers affiliated with sanctioned entities), months before they are reflected in public vulnerability disclosures.

Regular updates and automated alerts help ensure mechanisms remain functional and effective over time. This aligns with DORA’s requirement to test detection mechanisms regularly, as stipulated in DORA Article 25 .

Impact:

Financial institutions can reduce operational and cybersecurity risks by pinpointing weaknesses in their ICT networks early. By addressing these risks before they escalate, entities build resilience and fulfill DORA’s requirement to identify critical risks and single points of failure.

Protection and Prevention

Under DORA Article 9 of DORA, ICT systems are required to continuously monitor and control the security and functioning of ICT systems and tools. They also need to minimize the impact of ICT risk on ICT systems through the deployment of ICT security tools, policies, and procedures.

Additionally, financial entities need to design, procure, and implement ICT security policies and tools to ensure the resilience and continuity of these systems.

To ensure this, it’s crucial for financial entities to have:

  1. Real-Time Risk Awareness: Continuous monitoring and proactive detection ensure financial entities stay ahead of vulnerabilities, reducing the likelihood of ICT disruptions.
  2. Integrity and Security: SBOMs and binary analysis that provide high confidence in the authenticity and integrity of the components in ICT systems.
Requirement 1: Continuous Monitoring and Control of ICT Systems

To address the challenge of continuously monitoring and controlling the security of ICT systems and tools, financial entities will need the following capabilities:

  1. Continuous Monitoring of ICT Systems and Supply Chains
    • Through this, Exiger can detect risks such as vulnerabilities, end-of-life components, and supply chain fragility.
  2. Proactive Detection
    • Lets organizations identify and prioritize risks before they become public vulnerabilities, enabling critical early intervention.
  3. Binary Analysis
    • Generate an SBOM that can then be analyzed and validated to verify the integrity of software components, thus reducing risks associated with poor coding practices or hidden sabotage.

Impact:

Continuous monitoring allows financial entities to maintain a real-time understanding of their ICT systems’ security posture. This proactive approach minimizes the impact of ICT risks by detecting potential vulnerabilities early and ensuring they are addressed promptly, directly fulfilling Article 9, Paragraph 1 for DORA.

Identification of ICT-Supported Functions

As part of the ICT risk management framework referred to in DORA Article 6 of the DORA, financial entities are required to identify, classify, and adequately document all ICT-supported business functions, roles, and responsibilities.

DORA Article 8 goes into detail on what this identification process entails, which includes identifying sources of ICT risks and conducting risk assessments. On top of that, entities are also expected to identify and document processes that are dependent on third-party service providers.

To meet the requirements under Article 8, financial entities would require capabilities that include:

  1. Proactive Risk Monitoring: Continuous identification of threats and vulnerabilities reduces the likelihood of ICT disruptions and improves risk visibility.
  2. Third-Party Assurance: Tools for mapping dependencies and risks tied to third-party providers ensure compliance with critical function documentation requirements.
  3. Legacy System Security: The capability to generate SBOMs from software binaries and then analyze them to find vulnerabilities, including if they’re deprecated, have been acquired by other companies, or are no longer supported. Financial institutions don’t need to depend on third parties in order to understand the composition or risk of their software.
Requirement 1: Identifying, Classification, and Documentation of ICT Assets

DORA requires the identification, classification, and documentation of key ICT assets. Financial entities also need to review (as needed and at least yearly) the adequacy of this classification and any relevant documentation.

How to Meet Them with Exiger:

Ensuring an accurate, updated catalog of ICT functions will be critical here. Exiger helps with these three crucial capabilities:

Exiger enables financial entities to implement layered detection and response controls by offering advanced monitoring capabilities . This includes:

  • Discovery : Exiger’s platforms enable automated discovery and classification of software components within ICT assets, including proprietary and open-source libraries and dependencies.
  • Mapping Roles and Dependencies : Exiger provides insights into the relationships between different software components, helping to uncover unknown risks like anomalies in the chain of custody, contributions from known bad actors, and  FOCI risk from adversarial nations or sanctioned entities and documenting these dependencies for business-critical operations​​.
  • Periodic Review Mechanisms : Continuous monitoring of all the components to ensure inventories are updated in real-time so that they can be reviewed at least yearly, meeting regulatory standards​​.

Impact:

These capabilities ensure financial entities maintain an accurate and up-to-date catalog of all ICT-supported functions, roles, and responsibilities. By documenting interdependencies and risks, entities can easily comply with DORA’s requirement to classify and review ICT assets and their documentation annually.

Conclusion

Even for financial entities and organizations adhering to best industry practices and standards, the DORA Act is not something to be underestimated. As we’ve observed in Exploring DORA, the act is robust and complex and requires the right technology to ensure due diligence and compliance.

Overall, Exiger offers robust solutions that align closely with DORA requirements, particularly for legacy systems, risk assessment, and third-party dependency mapping. These capabilities provide financial entities with the transparency of their software supply chain needed to build resilience and maintain compliance. To learn more about how the 1Exiger platform can help address your DORA requirement gaps, please request a demo.

Table of Contents

Learn more

Learn how Exiger's supply chain risk management solutions can anchor your culture of security.
insights

Perspectives

Webinar

The Four Forces Shaping Resilience in 2027

Supply Chain Management
Supply Chain Risk Management
Supply Chain Visibility
Risk & Operations
Tariffs and Trade Friction
Your Backup Supplier May Share the Same Point of Failure
Article

Your Backup Supplier May Share the Same Point of Failure

AI technology
Autonomous Supply Chain
Compliance
Risk & Operations
Supply Chain Resilience
Faster Sourcing Changes the Risk Equation
Article

Faster Sourcing Changes the Risk Equation

AI technology
Autonomous Supply Chain
Compliance
Risk & Operations
Supply Chain Resilience
Why Procurement Is Moving Up the CFO Agenda
Article

Why Procurement Is Moving Up the CFO Agenda

AI technology
Autonomous Supply Chain
Compliance
Risk & Operations
Supply Chain Resilience
DPW 2026 and the Decisions Procurement Can Change
Article

DPW 2026 and the Decisions Procurement Can Change

AI technology
Autonomous Supply Chain
Compliance
Risk & Operations
Supply Chain Resilience
The Agentic Procurement Reality Check
Article

The Agentic Procurement Reality Check

AI technology
Autonomous Supply Chain
Compliance
Risk & Operations
Supply Chain Resilience
FCC Moves to Require Onshoring or Reciprocal Recognition of Device Test Labs
Client Alert

FCC Moves to Require Onshoring or Reciprocal Recognition of Device Test Labs

AI technology
Compliance
Foreign Ownership
Geopolitical Issues
Supply Chain Optimization
Executive Order 14415 Could Reach Commercial and Dual-Use Suppliers
Article

Executive Order 14415 Could Reach Commercial and Dual-Use Suppliers

Critical Infrastructure
Defense
Geopolitical Issues
Part Selection and Management
Supply Chain Management
Executive Order 14415 Puts Product-Level Evidence at the Center of Defense Supply Chain Risk
Article

Executive Order 14415 Puts Product-Level Evidence at the Center of Defense Supply Chain Risk

Defense
Critical Minerals
Supply Chain Visibility
Supply Chain Risk Management
Government Regulations
Exiger & Vodafone Executive Dinner
Event

Exiger & Vodafone Executive Dinner

Autonomous Supply Chain
Supply Chain Management
Supply Chain Optimization
Supply Chain Resilience
Supply Chain Risk Management
Product Tour

1EXIGER.AI Live Product Demos

AI technology
Risk & Operations
Software Supply Chain Security
Supply Chain Management
How to Win a Trade War: Inside the New Rules of Economic Conflict with Soumaya Keynes
Podcast

How to Win a Trade War: Inside the New Rules of Economic Conflict with Soumaya Keynes

AI technology
Geopolitical Issues
Risk & Operations
Risk Assessments
Software Supply Chain Security